Skip to content
Frequently Asked Question
Environment & Climate

Water use

Last reviewed: July 11, 2026

Summary

Plant foods use far less water than animal products, so shifting toward plants is one of the biggest ways to cut your dietary water footprint. The comparisons are stark: about 15,400 litres go into a kilogram of beef (~1,800 gallons per pound), roughly 5,000 litres into a kilogram of cheese, and about 628 litres into a single litre of cow's milk — versus roughly 48 litres per litre for oat milk and 28 for soy milk, with legumes, grains, and potatoes lower still. One honest refinement: most of beef's footprint is "green water" (rainfall on pasture), so in water-scarce regions the fairest comparison focuses on "blue water" (irrigation) — and even on that stricter metric animal products generally come out worse. A few plant foods (notably California almonds) have real regional irrigation footprints worth choosing around, but the overall gap isn't close.

Supported by 0 cited sources

Evidence Summary

{"keyPoints": [ "Mekonnen & Hoekstra (2012, Ecosystems) conducted the most comprehensive global assessment of water footprints for animal products. Their finding: beef averages 15,400 liters per kilogram globally. This figure is widely cited in vegan advocacy. However, the number is a total water footprint that combines three very different types of water, and presenting it without this context is misleading.", "The green-blue-grey framework: GREEN water is rainfall that would occur regardless

...

Supporting Evidence

Caveats: Some plant foods are also water-intensive; context matters.

Sources & Evidence

0 sources cited across 2 claims

1

Animal products often have high water footprints

Systematic Review
2

Plant-forward diets generally reduce water impacts

Systematic Review

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical or nutritional advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before making dietary changes.